Specifically, the disillusionment of men who haven’t radicalized but have adopted radical ideologies and the infantilization of the modern workplace. MEL recently spoke with Palahniuk about the book’s influence on the toxic ideologies that have taken hold in our culture today why he thinks another kind of toxic ideology - toxic masculinity - doesn’t exist the meaning of Harvey Weinstein, Joseph Campbell and John Lennon’s assassination and how he coined the derogatory term “snowflake.”Ī lot of the things you wrote about in Fight Club and revisit in Fight Club 2 seem even more pertinent today than when you originally wrote them more than 20 years ago. If Durden were alive today, he wouldn’t inspire Project Mayhem - he’d be wearing a MAGA hat, leading a group of disaffected young men through the streets with pitchforks and staging #GamerGate-esque online harassment campaigns.Īnd so, Fight Club seems to be a rallying cry for their anger.
In response, a substantial number of them have dug in to oppose that evolution - men who seem to worship at the altar of Tyler Durden, the Fight Club character who was a paragon of unfettered, unapologetic machismo. And many of them are facing the troubling realization that they will never be as successful as their parents.
Modern men find themselves in a precarious position, where masculinity itself is being (justifiably) re-evaluated, and in some cases, derided as the source of all society’s ills.
But the themes Palahniuk explored in that book - the emasculation of late-capitalism and the creeping sense of worthlessness and dread that accompanies it - seems more relevant now than it did even back then.
+1.jpg "fight club 2")
It’s been more than 20 years since Chuck Palahniuk first unleashed Fight Club on the world and simultaneously inspired legions of impressionable young men and appalled their parents.
0 kommentar(er)
